In an earlier post, I referred to elitists in a way that implied that I might myself possibly be an elitist.
I want to correct that potential misunderstanding right now. I have no truck with elitism. In fact, elitism is beneath me.
I am a melitist. I practice melitism.
Maybe there should be hyphens in that. Me-litism.
Hm. Perhaps this one needs to be workshopped a bit. Yet it would work perfectly well off the page! It's only in the written that this cursed ambiguity creeps in. It's "me LEET ism" not "me LIGHT ism" or "me LIT ism"!
Ah, what's the use. Surely some Terry Ballard out there said it first anyway.
I want to correct that potential misunderstanding right now. I have no truck with elitism. In fact, elitism is beneath me.
I am a melitist. I practice melitism.
Maybe there should be hyphens in that. Me-litism.
Hm. Perhaps this one needs to be workshopped a bit. Yet it would work perfectly well off the page! It's only in the written that this cursed ambiguity creeps in. It's "me LEET ism" not "me LIGHT ism" or "me LIT ism"!
Ah, what's the use. Surely some Terry Ballard out there said it first anyway.
Comments
Sorry about the delayed response.
(hey...just to be clear, is RJW TWO PEOPLE???!!! I'm confused as all get out. Some people say Ryan, some people say Jamie, I feel quite out of the know you know - sometimes one or the other of you signs off, but maybe it's only Jamie?)