Warning: This post contains dialogue of a nature that I simply can't endorse! References to the sex act, or in fact, to multifarious arrays and multitudinous instances of each of them, in a context that seems pretty damn near lacking in the emotional aspect and the committed, exclusive context that - for me - makes monogamy so compelling.
She: I love that. Wow.
He: Yeah. That was nice.
She: Never have I performed such multitudinous instances of each of a multifarious array of sex acts, in a context so lacking in the emotional aspect and committed, exclusive character that so typify my usual penchant for monogamy.
He: Yeah. You said it. Beautiful.
She: I have to confess, I never even gave anyone oral sex before!
He: Well, you sure made up for it! Impressive. A born expert! I almost got my wallet out.
She: Tee hee!
He: Yeah, me too.
She: Who knew sex without love could be this way?
He: I know I didn't know it! It's a policy of mine to make love only. None of this vulgar, clinical "having sex," none of this crass "fucking."
She: Oh, me too! More than "me too." And yet, great as it was and as much as I enjoyed everything so much, my feelings toward you are the same. They haven't changed.
He: I enjoyed everything. Particularly your breasts, a very enjoyable and engaging pair.
She: Thank you! You like them?
He: Oh, very much.
She: But it's so weird, isn't it? As much as I enjoyed doing everything, and as revelatory as the experience was ...
He: ... epiphianic ...
She: Yes! Or, "epiphanic," really, but I love what you mean!
He: "Epiphanic"? Really? Not "epiphianic"?
She: Yup. Sorry. Yours is quite lovely, but wrong.
He: But it's like "messianic," or it should be...?
She: I agree it should be. But nope.
He: I'll stick with "epiphianic," even if it is wrong.
She: Well, I'll stick with this - even if it is wrong!
He: Mm!
She: Mmf!
He: ...
He: ...wow...
She: Mmmmn.
He: You know what else is weird?
She: Mmmmn?
He: Never mind. That's fine. Talk later.
She: Mmmmn!
No comments:
Post a Comment