A Plea For Unity Originating From Trisol

"Soliens" is I think what all natives of this star system - from lowliest bacterium to highest dolphin or ape (such as us) (beings with third-class minds), and even including what used to be called "contagious living fluids" (viruses, might as well throw in PRIONS) ought to be called. 

We would be Trisoliens. Natives of Trisol. Well why not?

BIG NOTE: "third-class minds" not really important at this phase of development, but 2nd-class minds would include living beings at this point hypothetical only: material and/or energy-based, anything possessing both sentience at a level of sapience AND physicality as a prime or juked attribute that is capable of primary perception (without need of sensory organs), but such perception has limits (such as C/lightspeed, et al). Trisolien, Solien or otherwise (extrasolien, otherdimensional et al) would be a 2nd or 1st class mind ("1st class" would have no sensory limits to its primary perception, and would thus functionally be omniscient).

_________________________

Naturally, otherworldly or otherdimensional living beings might be organized along any principles at all besides the grok-amok hurlyburly amino twist we call "DNA." They might not even be carbon based. I strongly tend to believe there are other third-class minds out there, but my skeptic instinct roots pretty deep in me and I say all natives of Trisol should be SKEPTIC as to the existence of these SO-CALLED "second" and "third" "class" "minds"

Just as a good sort of "go-by."

_______________

SKEPTIC does not equal "DOUBTER." 

Doubters presume what they can know or imagine forms a practical limit to what is. They take unknowledge (including: unprovability) as if it's some law or even principle (or "go-by") of the universe, and so end up saying cockamamie things like: "FIRST-CLASS MIND(s)?! NOT IN THIS REALITY! GO FISH!" Bunch of sh!t-for-brainses, to be honest.

A skeptic would want to see all such "limits" demonstrable before giving tuff (or other) credence to them. As a practical matter though, skeptics and "doubters" do tend to converge upon a lot of samsies-type points: but how they got there is radical, almost diametric in its difference.